{"id":986,"date":"2019-04-22T21:24:03","date_gmt":"2019-04-22T21:24:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/?p=986"},"modified":"2019-04-22T21:24:03","modified_gmt":"2019-04-22T21:24:03","slug":"nine-uncomfortable-canadian-energy-facts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/index.php\/2019\/04\/22\/nine-uncomfortable-canadian-energy-facts\/","title":{"rendered":"Nine Uncomfortable Canadian Energy Facts"},"content":{"rendered":"

Nine Uncomfortable Canadian Energy Facts<\/strong><\/h2>\n

We\u2019re not cutting emissions as much as we should, and we\u2019re dependent on an increasingly expensive source of oil.<\/h3>\n

By\u00a0<\/strong>Andrew Nikiforuk<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>\u00a0|\u00a0TheTyee.ca<\/strong><\/p>\n

Andrew Nikiforuk is an award-winning journalist who has been writing about the energy industry for two decades and is a contributing editor to The Tyee. Find his previous stories\u00a0here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Canada\u2019s energy twilight: Canada can\u2019t meet emission targets and expand bitumen or shale gas production at the same time, according to energy expert David Hughes.\u00a0<\/strong>Photo by\u00a0Jeff Peischl\/NOAA<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Canadians are global energy pigs; we\u2019re high emitters of carbon and certainly aren\u2019t leaders in renewable energy.<\/h4>\n

In addition \u201caspirational\u201d plans by Canadian politicians won\u2019t deliver promised emission reductions on climate change without major reductions in energy consumption.<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

These are just some of the hard energy facts contained in\u00a0Canada\u2019s Energy Outlook<\/a>, a new and encyclopedic report by David Hughes, one of Canada\u2019s foremost energy experts.<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

Hughes, whose reliable research is cited by the likes of Bloomberg, Nature, The Economist and The Tyee, has been analyzing energy trends for industry and government for more than 30 years.<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

Unlike many environmentalists, Hughes does not believe that a transition to renewables or even reductions in greenhouse gases will be seamless, easy or cheap. Here\u2019s why:<\/h4>\n

<\/h4>\n

1) Canadians live high and large on largely fossil fuel-based energy.<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n

On a per capita basis we consume energy at more than five times the world average. We even consume more energy than oil hungry Americans and twice as much as the average citizen in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Citizens in Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Japan, nations that don\u2019t export oil, consume energy at less than half the rate of Canadians.<\/h4>\n

Canada consumed 2.5 per cent of the world\u2019s energy in 2016, and that consumption has increased at .13 per cent per year over the past two years. Fossil fuels, of course, dominated Canada\u2019s energy menu: oil and gas at 57 per cent; coal at five per cent; nuclear at seven per cent; hydroelectricity at 27 per cent and solar and wind at 3.1 per cent. \u201cCanada is among the highest oil consuming countries in the world, at 23.6 barrels per person per year, which is six per cent more than the average American and five times the world average,\u201d Hughes writes. (All quotes in this story are from his report.)<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

2) Thanks to all that energy guzzling Canadians have one of the world\u2019s highest carbon footprints.<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n

\u201cCanada\u2019s per capita emissions of greenhouse gases are among the highest in the world \u2014 3.2 times the world average, more than double that of China (the world\u2019s highest total emitter) and eight times that of India.\u201d<\/h4>\n

Per capita carbon dioxide emissions are highest, by order, in six fossil fuel exporting nations: U.A.E., Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Australia, U.S. and Russia.<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

3) As an oil exporting nation Canada has never been a leader in renewable energy.<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n

With but 3.1 per cent non-hydro renewable energy, Canada ranks below the world average of 3.8 per cent and way below the United States at 5.3 per cent. In contrast Denmark, an oil-importing nation, got nearly a quarter of its primary energy from renewables in 2016. \u201cEven the most aggressive scenarios in Canada\u2019s mid-century strategy don\u2019t see wind growing to more than 24 per cent of total generation and solar to more than six per cent (which would require an 18-fold increase in wind and a 32-fold increase in solar from current levels).\u201d<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

4) Canada can\u2019t meet emission targets and expand bitumen or shale gas production at the same time.<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n

Greenhouse gas emissions from oil and gas extraction amounted to 26 per cent of Canada\u2019s total in 2015 and could rise to 76 per cent by 2040.<\/h4>\n

\u201cExpanding oil and gas production as projected by the National Energy Board means that the rest of Canada\u2019s economy will have to reduce emissions by 49 per cent by 2030, and 85 per cent by 2040, to meet emissions reduction targets. This is almost certainly impossible in the timeframe available.\u201d<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

5) The oilsands, junk heavy crude, are an important resource that has a limited economic future due to its poor quality.<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n

\u201cAlthough on paper Canada has the third-largest resource of oil in the world, in practice 97.4 per cent of proven reserves are low-quality oilsands that are energy- and emissions-intensive to extract and costly to refine. Some 80 per cent of the remaining recoverable resources in the oilsands are too deep for mining and thus require even more energy- and emissions-intensive in situ methods to extract. Furthermore, industry invariably extracts the highest-quality, most economic resources first, which means that much of Canada\u2019s remaining oil resource will cost more to extract than current operations and will produce higher levels of emissions.\u201d<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

6) Canadian energy firms are spending more energy to get less energy from the oilsands.<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n

Energy return on energy investment\u00a0or EROI<\/a>\u00a0measures the ratio of energy gained versus how much energy was required to get that energy. Conventional oil, the driver of the global economy, once had an EROI of 100:1 but those energy returns have shrunk to 17:1 as oil gets more expensive and difficult to find. The EROI for fracked oil in the United States is 11.1. (In other words one barrel of oil must be spent to find 11 more.) Due to its high energy intensity, bitumen production falls way below these averages. Bitumen steamed out of the ground has an EROI of 4:1 but would be closer to 2:1 if the calculation included transport and refining to the point of use. Mined bitumen has an EROI of 8:1. \u201cWhen EROI approaches a breakeven point it makes no energetic sense to pursue further extraction,\u201d Hughes explains in his report.<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

7) Canada is a well-dammed country.<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n

Hydro power, a low carbon source of energy, makes up about 59 per cent of all electrical generation in the country, and that power comes from nearly 600 dams. As a result \u201cCanada\u2019s electricity consumption is among the highest in the world \u2014 more than five times the world average on a per capita basis.\u201d<\/h4>\n

According to Hughes, \u201cCanada ranked a distant second in the world to China in terms of total hydropower generation (374 TWh versus 1,163 TWh in 2015).\u201d Six high-cost projects are under construction in Newfoundland, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba and B.C. Hughes estimates that the controversial Site C project will \u201ccost $8.335 billion, or $7,577 (US$5,683) per kilowatt, which is at the high end of the cost scale, roughly the same as nuclear.\u201d<\/h4>\n

Yet to meet climate targets the Canadian government forecasts \u201cin its mid-century strategy scenarios that hydropower capacity will have to increase on average by 107 per cent by 2050.\u201d<\/h4>\n

\u201cDeveloping this much additional hydropower in just 33 years would require up to 118 new dams the size of Site C at a cost of up to US$739 billion. \u201c<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

8) Nuclear power is a declining force in Canada.<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n

\u201cPer capita consumption peaked in Canada in 1994 and in the world as a whole in 2002.\u201d The nation\u2019s 19 operating reactors account for 14 per cent of Canada\u2019s electrical generation but four reactors in Ontario and Quebec are being decommissioned.<\/h4>\n

\u201cEven with the expenditure of $26 billion on refurbishments of the Bruce and Darlington reactors, Canadian nuclear power is set to decline by about 39 per cent over the next two decades unless new reactors are constructed.\u201d<\/h4>\n

Compared to other forms of electrical generation building nuclear power plants costs \u201cfive times more than gas, three times more than onshore wind and two times more than utility-scale solar.\u201d<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

9) Canada doesn\u2019t have a sustainable energy strategy but based on the evidence, it should largely focus on reducing energy consumption across the board in industry, housing and transportation.<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n

Using incentives to build renewables should be complemented with a program that eliminates fossil fuel subsidies of \u201cUS$1,283 per person in Canada in 2015.\u201d Furthermore: \u201cReducing consumption will maximize the effectiveness of investments in renewable energy, and will minimize overall expenditures on new energy supply and the inevitable economic costs and environmental impacts of developing it.\u201d<\/h4>\n

 <\/p>\n

Last but not least politicians need to realize that \u201cramping up oil and gas production is a non-starter if Canada wants to meet its emissions-reduction targets. Increasing production while attempting to meet emissions-reduction targets are conflicting goals, and the reality of having to limit production growth must be faced.\u201d<\/h3>\n

<\/h2>\n

Hughes concludes that Canada faces some very difficult energy choices ahead.<\/h2>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Nine Uncomfortable Canadian Energy Facts We\u2019re not cutting emissions as much as we should, and we\u2019re dependent on an increasingly expensive source of oil. By\u00a0Andrew Nikiforuk\u00a0\u00a0|\u00a0TheTyee.ca Andrew Nikiforuk is an award-winning journalist who has been writing about the energy industry for two decades and is a contributing editor to The Tyee. Find his previous stories\u00a0here.…","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":988,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[142,143,68,70,66],"class_list":["entry","author-larrynorton","post-986","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-canadians","tag-climate-change","tag-energy","tag-environment","tag-health"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/nortonspeaks.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/oilsands-syncrude.jpg?fit=2048%2C1365","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8bppg-fU","jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/986","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=986"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/986\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":989,"href":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/986\/revisions\/989"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/988"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=986"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=986"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/nortonspeaks.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=986"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}